The definitive comparison of who creates the best AI powered slides

Teste real + análise técnica: como 5 IAs se saíram criando slides sobre Bitcoin
Imagem destaque: ChatGPT

You know that moment when you need to create a presentation and all you have is panic and a blank slide? Take a deep breath, because there is artificial intelligence for that too. Yes, these tools make slides. And not just those default PowerPoint decks with Arial 28 and a blue background. I am talking about platforms that think about the visual design, write the content and hand you something ready for your final touch. It feels like magic, but it is just technology doing the heavy lifting for you.

These AI platforms can save the day whether you are presenting a college assignment, organizing a meeting or putting together a polished pitch. And the best part is that some of them do all that in minutes and for free, while you are still choosing the template.

Today you will see four of these tools and one new bonus option that claim to be the salvation of anyone who needs to impress with little time and even less energy to start a presentation from scratch. Here are Gamma.app, Manus AI, WorkPPT and Skywork.ai, plus a newcomer from the same category.

Gamma.app — the minimalist designer in the cloud

If you are the kind of person who prefers a clean visual style that does not fill the screen with unnecessary elements, Gamma will probably make you happy. Its aesthetic is modern, with soft palettes, elegant typography and icons that look like they came straight out of a design manual. The structure is very different from the classic PowerPoint approach. Each slide feels more like a content card where you can add videos, GIFs, clickable buttons and even interactive charts.

There is one detail though. The number of templates is still limited. If you create three presentations in a row, you will notice the repetition in style. It is nothing dramatic, but worth mentioning. There are no elaborate animations or movie-like transitions. The vibe here is simplicity with a refined touch.

Want to see it in action?

Gamma’s website shows several ready-made demos, and YouTube is full of people testing the tool live.

The examples follow a consistent pattern. Solid colors, images from libraries like Unsplash and Giphy and a kind of minimalism that makes you want to post the slides on LinkedIn. Users on Product Hunt praised the platform, especially for marketing use cases and collaborative work.

Can you edit? Yes

The editor is versatile. You can change text, fonts and colors, rearrange slides with drag and drop and even collaborate with your team in real time. Just a heads-up. Some parts feel similar to Notion, so if you only use PowerPoint, you may find it unusual at first. And if you want everything to match your brand perfectly, you will need to adjust the details manually. There is no magic branding button.

Fast, sometimes too fast

If you send a prompt, Gamma creates a basic eight-slide deck in a matter of seconds. The experience is smooth, especially for anyone who lives in the cloud. Exporting to PowerPoint can cause small issues, since some elements shift when opened there depending on the layout you choose.

Plans and pricing

You start with 400 free credits. After that, there are paid plans. The Plus plan is around 40 reais per month (or 30 in the annual option) and the Pro is 80 reais per month (or 60 annually). The Pro plan unlocks extras like custom fonts and full control over brand identity.

Who should use it

Gamma works well for anyone who needs speed. Students in a rush, entrepreneurs preparing pitches or marketing teams who want something quick and visually pleasant. If your presentation depends on heavy effects or dramatic animations, another platform from this list might suit you better.

Sharing works, but with limits

You can share the presentation link directly and export to PDF or PowerPoint. As mentioned earlier, PowerPoint may shift elements here and there, so stay alert.

What users are saying

Gamma holds an average rating of 4.6 on Product Hunt with more than 150 reviews. Most people like the ease of use and the visual quality, although some complain about the support feeling distant, almost like talking to an automated system.

Manus AI — the “does everything” tool that sometimes does too much

Manus sells itself as a superagent. You can drop in a prompt, a document or even a link, and it turns all of that into a full presentation. In theory, it sounds like the perfect assistant. In practice, it depends.

Visually, Manus likes to experiment. It generates slides in HTML and some days it gets the aesthetics right, while on others it looks more like a random landing page than a traditional slide deck.

The layouts vary, but the slide proportions often get left behind. Sixteen by nine feels like a distant memory. And be ready for charts popping up even in personal introduction slides. The AI loves adding decorative elements, even when they are not needed.

Can you preview before committing? Yes

The platform offers demos and case studies on its website. On Reddit, someone shared the presentation Manus created for an agency use case and was genuinely moved by the result. The visual style was elegant and the content was well structured, the kind of thing a premium client would expect.

Another example appeared on the channel The Tool Nerd. They tested Manus to build a nineteen-slide deck about prompt engineering. It came out complete, with RAG, autonomous prompting and everything tech enthusiasts love.

Can you edit it? Yes. But check everything. Always

You can adjust text, images, colors, transitions and export in PPTX, PDF or image formats. But since everything begins in HTML, there is a big chance the exported PowerPoint file will arrive misaligned or broken.

If misaligned fonts and layout shifts make you anxious, take a deep breath. The AI does around eighty percent of the job, but the remaining twenty percent still depends on you or a very patient human reviewer.

Fast, but temperamental

Manus runs on Claude 3.7 and can read long prompts, files and links. It analyzes the content, builds the structure and then generates the slides.

Most of the time it is fast, but during peak hours the server slows down. And there is a limit of one thousand characters per prompt, which means you cannot paste an entire thesis there.

Prices that fluctuate more than the AI’s mood

You start with one thousand free credits plus three hundred daily credits on the free plan. The Basic plan costs nineteen dollars per month (sixteen in the annual option) with nineteen hundred credits plus three hundred daily credits. The Plus plan costs thirty-nine dollars per month (thirty-three annual) with thirty-nine hundred credits plus three hundred daily. And the Pro plan, designed for heavy users, costs one hundred ninety-nine dollars per month (one hundred sixty-six annual) with nineteen thousand nine hundred credits plus three hundred daily.

Who uses it and for what

Business and marketing teams like it. They use Manus to create pitches, reports and campaign material. It also appears among teachers and creatives who need to turn complex content into something visual. But you must be patient. It is not a “click and present” kind of tool.

Exports work, but be careful

You can download the slides as PowerPoint, PDF or images, and there is even a presentation mode directly in the browser. Just be warned. When you open the exported file, surprises can happen. The layout does not always survive the transition from HTML to PowerPoint without damage.

What users are saying

Some people praise the elegant visuals and clear structure.

But there are also very sour reviews. Cut-off slides, misaligned text, double charges and refunds that never arrived.

Some even called the platform a scam disguised as AI. Still, specialized websites acknowledge that Manus saves time and often looks visually appealing. The issue is the price and the inconsistency. It costs a lot and rarely delivers a finished product without additional work.

WorkPPT — the slide generator that claims it can do everything, but where are the screenshots?

You know those tools that promise the world but disappear when it is time to show what they can actually do? That is WorkPPT in a nutshell. On its official website it presents itself as a “full AI suite” capable of creating presentations, summaries and even websites in a few seconds. It sounds great on paper. In practice, there is a lack of proof. You open the site and there is not a single example of a slide created with the help of the tool.

It promises to generate slides from text, links or even PDFs. The site also says it offers a presentation mode with sharing options. But here is the issue. No one is showing that in action.

The testimonials available sound more like marketing slogans than real reviews. There are people saying they saved time and that the slides came out ready to use, but where are the examples? Anyone who wants to see the results with their own eyes will have to test it themselves.

A demo? Only in the dark

Aside from a few motivational phrases in promotional campaigns, there are no real public examples. None on YouTube, none on blogs, none on Product Hunt. On Reddit, people mention the platform, but no one shares screenshots, links or actual reviews. If you are the type who likes to see something before committing, you may walk away disappointed.

Editing? Maybe. No one knows for sure

According to SourceForge, WorkPPT has an AI chat to help refine text and style. It also claims to offer slide previews and the ability to summarize documents and reorganize content.

It sounds promising. But no one explains whether you can change colors, fonts, images or layout. There is no confirmation about animations either. It could be a Swiss Army knife or just a plain can opener.

Fast? They say yes. Tested? Not yet

The tool promises to generate a complete deck in seconds, even from long PDFs. That would be great for anyone buried under documents. But so far there is no reliable report saying whether it freezes, glitches or actually delivers. It is a leap of faith.

Pricing for every kind of budget except the empty one

The free plan is the most limited among all the platforms in this comparison. Yes, WorkPPT managed to outdo Manus in that category. Prices range from nineteen ninety-nine per month to a lifetime plan for one hundred thirty-nine ninety-nine. There are also quarterly and annual options.

Who is it for (theoretically)?

WorkPPT claims to be made for professionals, educators, freelancers and marketing teams. It is supposed to help anyone who needs to turn reports and text into presentations or sites in record time. But since almost no real user has said “I tried it and liked it”, the target audience ends up being the curious and the brave.

Does it export? Probably

The site mentions a presentation mode and tools for sharing and publishing content online. It also mentions engagement tracking. This suggests it can export to PowerPoint and PDF, but once again it is all speculative. Nothing is clearly explained.

Reviews? Total silence

The SourceForge page is empty. Zero reviews. Reddit and other AI forums mention the name, but no one gives a solid opinion. It is one of those situations where either everyone used it and did not care or no one used it and everyone just repeated the marketing material.

I tested it myself and not everything shines

Of course I had to put the AI to work.

After entering the title of the presentation, Skywork shows a few template options, and they are basically the ones you saw in the images. Very generic themes with names like “Business Theme”, “Marketing Topics” or “Dark Blue Minimalist”. It works. But there is nothing you would not find in any PowerPoint template library.

In the free plan, limitations show up quickly. You do not get access to many templates and, even worse, you cannot download the file unless you pay. Yes, it generates the slides, but if you want to save the result as PDF or PowerPoint, you must open your wallet. They do not even allow public sharing via link without a paid subscription. That alone is disappointing, especially because all the other platforms at least let you download basic outputs for free.

Another annoying detail is that you cannot paste a full prompt or a structured text. You can only enter the title of the content and the AI will try to guess the rest. This severely limits customization and turns the tool into more of a surprise box than a controllable generator.

So yes, you can test visual style and structure, but if you want to build something based on your own text or use AI as a real working tool, the free version of Skywork will not help much.

Skywork.ai — the overachiever of the slide-making world

You know that student who always sat in the front row, made perfectly organized summaries with colorful charts and somehow still found time to illustrate everything? That is Skywork. The platform is part of a suite of intelligent agents that handle documents, spreadsheets, web pages and even podcasts. But today the focus is the Slides Agent, the little robot that builds presentations as if it were defending a thesis for a NASA committee.

Visually, Skywork delivers a clean layout, proper sixteen-nine ratio, well-positioned graphics and a few subtle animations that do not scream for attention.

According to The Tool Nerd, it gets the structure and flow right without overdecorating anything. It manages to look elegant without crossing into tacky territory. And yes, it has even generated presentations with ethical reflections. Ethics in a slide. Who would have imagined?

Real examples? Yes, absolutely

The company showcases case studies with a clear “look what I can do” attitude. A twelve-page financial report became a fifteen-slide deck with investment thesis and data visualizations, all generated within minutes.

The same Tool Nerd tested it with a prompt about prompt engineering and praised the depth of the content. On Product Hunt, the platform is still new but already received applause and a five-out-of-five rating. People called it “creative”, “amazing” and “a time saver”, which is exactly what we want to hear.

Editing? Possible. But it likes structure

Skywork lets you change some elements such as visual identity and final format. But if you want to deviate too much from the template, you will need external tools. It is the type that prioritizes the content itself. Research, structure and data first. Design comes later.

It exports to PDF and PowerPoint and can even convert the content into other formats, turning a slide into a document, spreadsheet or podcast. It is versatile.

Fast and organized

The case studies show that it can turn hours of research into fifteen minutes of efficiency. The resulting presentation appears a few minutes later. No waiting for the AI to think.

What is most surprising is that even at that speed the content still feels like something crafted with intention.

Price

The plans range from the Free tier, which gives a few weekly credits, up to the Pro plan that costs two hundred thirty-five ninety per month or one hundred ninety-nine ninety if you pay annually. The Basic plan costs twenty-three ninety per month (nineteen ninety annually) and the Standard plan costs forty-seven per month (thirty-nine ninety annually).

All plans offer daily and monthly credits, cost estimation attempts, template uploads and access to premium models. The free plan can help you test things. You get five hundred credits per week, one cost estimation attempt, the option to upload three templates and access to some databases. You can experiment without paying, but if you want the tool at full capacity, you will need a subscription.

Who is this slide builder for?

Analysts, consultants, teachers, university students and anyone who needs solid content backed by real research instead of visual decoration. The Tool Nerd recommends it for people who want to learn or teach a topic in depth. If all you need is a quick summary with a pretty layout, Gamma might be a better fit.

Exporting and repurposing

Besides PDFs and PPTs, you can present directly from the browser. The best part is that the same content can become a spreadsheet, a document or even a podcast. One prompt, multiple output formats. That is real multitasking AI.

What people are saying

On Product Hunt, the few comments available are overwhelmingly positive. Someone described the tool as “professional and affordable”, and another said it turns simple prompts into full reports. In independent comparisons, Skywork consistently comes out as the favorite for structure and depth.

Bonus: Genspark — the new kid still finding its footing

Genspark is a name many people have not heard yet. They arrived in the wave of AI superagents and recently added a slide generator to the platform. Since the feature is still new, there are not many reviews or comparisons out there. But I tested it, and here is my honest take.

The design is… interesting.

It is not ugly and not poorly executed, but it also does not impress. It works and delivers the basics correctly, although it lacks that visual impact that makes you think “wow, this is ready to present”. The templates have a modern vibe and offer good ideas, but they do not trigger that wow effect. It sits in that “it’s fine” zone without much excitement.

Now, the generation time is where things get tricky. I found it slow, especially considering that the final result is only okay. Anyone in a hurry or needing something quick might feel frustrated. This can improve with time, of course, and it is clear they are still evolving the tool, but for now I would still choose Gamma.app.

The pricing is within market range. The free plan offers two hundred credits per day, and the paid plans start at twenty-four ninety-nine per month, with a discount if you subscribe annually, dropping to nineteen ninety-nine. The Pro plan, which unlocks everything, costs two hundred forty-nine ninety-nine per month or one hundred ninety-nine ninety-nine annually. Nothing out of the ordinary here, especially since they offer cloud storage, AI image and video generation and access to models like GPT four, Gemini, Claude and others.

Exporting? Approved

You can export as PowerPoint, PDF or share through a public link. This part is convenient, especially if you need to send a presentation without relying on attachments.

In the end, Genspark is still under construction. It has potential but needs to pick up the pace, literally. It is worth keeping an eye on it, especially if the response time improves in the coming months.

A Final Look at What Stands Out

After going through everything these platforms offer, Gamma rises to the top. It delivers steady performance, clear visuals and a smooth writing flow that matches what most users expect when they need something ready fast. The feedback available online supports this idea. People highlight how easy it is to work with and how consistent its results feel. It strikes a calm balance between design and clarity, which makes it a dependable choice for everyday use.

Skywork deserves attention as well. It brings a strong sense of organization and depth, especially when the topic requires more research and structure. The impression it gives is that it thinks before placing every element on the page. Even assim, it leans toward a more technical style, which may not be ideal for anyone who just wants a clean deck without extra steps.

WorkPPT sits on the other end of the list. The platform makes big promises, but there is little evidence of what it can actually produce. There are no solid examples and almost no real reviews. Anyone searching for clarity or trust in the experience may end up disappointed, since everything sounds good in theory but does not show up in practice.

Deixe seu comentário: